Kelly Blue Book Declares Tundra Has Best Full-Size Truck Resale Value

0 Flares 0 Flares ×

Despite the “perfect storm of economic issues” cited by Eric Ibara, director, market valuation for Kelley Blue Book, the Toyota Tundra was declared to be have the best resale value of any full-size truck model for 2009.

If you were looking for one more reason to buy a 2009 Tundra (in addition to a great engine, spectacular tow rating, safety, top-rated reliability, and Toyota quality, there you have it.

Read all about 2009’s best resale value awards on KBB.com.

Filed Under: Toyota Tundra Reviews and ComparisonsTundra News

RSSComments (16)

Leave a Reply | Trackback URL

  1. TXTee says:

    I’m lazy so someone tell me what’s new for 09. Not sure if there’s already a blog out there. And just lazy so don’t feel like visiting the Toyota site. 🙂

  2. JEREMY Bringer of Great News says:

    2 new trd packages and a flex fuel upgrade for the 5.7 4×4.

  3. TXTee says:

    Very cool – I do remember reading it somewhere on here now b/c I somewhat wished for the FlexFuel.

  4. Ingle says:

    alright!!!

  5. Tote Barr says:

    I guess that we need to go along with the crowd offering a “flex-fuel” version of the Tundra, even though it is one of the biggest rip-offs around. We are supposed to be proud of a fuel that:
    1-Costs more to make, both in dollars and in natural resources.
    2-Creates far more in pollution in its manufacture than it saves when burning.
    3-Reduces the Miles per Gallon significantly.
    4-Costs more at the pump because you have to buy more of it to go the same distance as good ‘ol Gas.
    5-In our area, at least, costs more per gallon than gasoline.
    6-Cannot be shipped in pipelines like gasoline so it needs to be trucked from location to location.
    7-Is harder on engines and fuel systems than gasoline.
    In our state, as far as I have been able to locate, there are only 2 gas stations that carry e-85. Both are brand new stations, and both were told by Chevron that if they wanted to open, they had to have E-85 available.
    I asked one of the station owners how there customer like it and was told “we have several people who have purchased 1 tank of E-85 and then refill with gasoline.
    This is yet another example that proves that you only need to seem to be doing something to solve a problem, rather than actually solving it, if you’re the government.
    If we are really going to use something other than gasoline, Natural gas is a far better alternative than “Corn Likker”.

  6. Tote Bar – You are correct. For many people, E85 isn’t available. For the people that do have access to the fuel, many can’t purchase it for less than the price of gasoline. For the lucky few who can buy it for less than gas, it’s not very fuel efficient (mileage is worse). Finally, E85 isn’t much better than gas from an environmental standpoint. My opinion is that E85 should be a very small part of a very big picture, and I agree that government regulators placed far too much emphasis on it.

  7. Mickey says:

    I’m glad we’re doing well in Kelly Blue Book. Only if the dealers would use that or N.A.D.A.. Now they that black book for auctions which is about $2,000 cheaper for them and that’s how much you lose when trading in your vehicle. Any mods done on your trade in they automatically go to that too.

  8. TXTee says:

    Sell private party and put a little work into it and you’ll get what you want. Trade-ins are rarely ever in consumer favor with the exception of saving some sales tax.

  9. TXTee – Good advice. The sales tax benefit is a good catch.

  10. Anonymous says:

    Understand that TXTee. When I tried to trade a 03 crown victoreia LX Sport which wasn’t in the black book and the dealer tried to give me a black book on a regular crown vic I got up and stated last chance or I walk out and you get $0 and I’ll buy 2 vehicles someplace else. Then he asked what was kelly and NADA. I told him and he gave me btween kelly and NADA for trade in. The difference of $2,000.

  11. Mickey says:

    My comments above. I don’t know why my name keeps dropping out.

  12. Charles says:

    I am a Toyota salesman in Las Vegas, and the Tundras (and all the other brands) selling kind of slowly, but I just sold one 3 days ago because the greater resale value over F150, so it is great information in this site.
    Greetings
    Chareles

  13. Charles – Bring us up at the next sales meeting man! Talking about this site (which gets more than 20k visitors a month) will help you sell more trucks I think.

  14. Mickey says:

    Congrats Charles to you and the person who bought the Tundra.

  15. Cmacfiredog says:

    Why isn’t the 2010 Tundra listed in the kelly blue book yet? I need to sell mine because I moved to the mountains and my 4×2 is awful — the rear end is too light for our sloping, gravel driveway. I can’t seem to find anywhere online to get the research before the sale.

  16. Jason says:

    Cmacfiredog – KBB, NADA, and Edmunds rely upon transactional data to create their pricing guides. Because there aren’t a lot of used 2010’s being bought and sold right now, there’s not a lot of data.

    Typically, a used current model year vehicle is worth $2k-$3k less than invoice minus the cash value of any available incentives. If I had to guess (and this is only a guess), I would say a 2010 model is worth $6-8K less than invoice. However, it really doesn’t matter what I think – your local Toyota dealers are the experts.

0 Flares Twitter 0 Facebook 0 Google+ 0 Email -- 0 Flares ×